42

There are two orthogonal, equally valid and equally unverifiable axioms about the foundation of reality that existed for a long time in our society. One is from the west, which is the scientific worldview. It claims that the world is made of matter. This matter came out of nothing, from matter came the life form, the simple organisms first and then the complex one. The complex organisms later developed a central nerves-system, from this emerged the mind and the consciousness. This consciousness, that ultimately emerged from the mater, enables the organism to perceive the material world back. The other theory is from the east, which is the spiritual world view. It claims that the consciousness is the fundamental aspect of reality from which the mind, thought and the objective world emerges. The former aims to unlock the mystery of reality by dissecting the matter. The later does so by introspecting the consciousness.

    Writing a recursive function requires a special kind of thinking, you have to write the function assuming that it already exists and you have to some how use it in the current function that you are writing. By the time you figure out how to call the other function, the problem would have been solved for you. It is like trying to build a time machine, then realizing that, once you build it, you could travel back in time and give it to your younger self so that you didn't have to build it in the first place. But you still have the problem of how to start this whole process in a way that your future self has the possibility of completing the time machine and travel back. After writing this post, I noticed that there is a name for this phenomenon. It's called the "Bootstrap paradox".

   My entire life seems like an elaborate demonstration of Murphy's law.  

    The notion that, 'What we perceive is the actual reality', is not only improbable but completely unnecessary from the evolutionary standpoint